FILMS RUN GANTLET FOR SEATTLE
Soren Andersen, The News Tribune,
May 16, 2005
They come in a flood, these aspiring Spielbergs and Hitchcock
hopefuls. On DVD and on VHS (though fewer and fewer of those
these days), they come, pouring into the offices of the Seattle
International Film Festival from around the country and around
They are movies from filmmakers hoping to
find fame, or at least a measure of artistic exposure, by
landing a spot on the festival program.
Organizers of Seattle’s annual film marathon routinely boast
that they show more movies than any other festival in the
country. More than 230 features are on the schedule for this
year’s festival, which begins Thursday and runs through June 12.
This is SIFF’s largest offering, says Carl Spence, the
festival’s director of programming. The Sundance festival, by
comparison, screened around 120 features in January.
But that 230 figure is dwarfed by the number of submissions that
flooded over the transom for SIFF 2005: just under 2,100, said
Beth Barrett, one of the members of Spence’s programming team.
That’s up from 1,386 received for the 2004 festival.
As many as 50 a day came this year, packing the festival’s film
vault, a small room tucked away in a corner of the SIFF
headquarters near downtown Seattle. Most arrive unheralded in
plain envelopes accompanied by an application form.
Obviously, the odds are long that any film will make the final
cut. They’re made longer still by the fact that only 10 to 15
percent of films submitted in this fashion actually make it onto
the festival program. The vast majority of pictures screened at
SIFF are ones programmers have seen at other, earlier festivals,
or which have been recommended to staff members by people in the
So how does a mailed-in movie make it onto the big screen at the
Egyptian Theater or any of the other festival venues? It has to
run a gantlet. In the case of “Deepwater,” a psychological
thriller wrapped around a murder mystery, that gantlet stretched
all the way from Seattle to Palm Springs, Calif.
Palm Springs is where SIFF co-founder
and longtime former festival director Darryl Macdonald now runs
that city’s film festival. Although he left Seattle two years
ago to take the Palm Springs job , Macdonald still has close
ties to SIFF and remains on its programming team. He was given
first crack at “Deepwater.”
It was sent to him in February by the staff at SIFF in a package
containing about a dozen movies. It came to him unheralded.
In Seattle, “nobody had seen it,” Macdonald said by phone from
Palm Springs. It had been grabbed off a shelf in the vault with
others at random.
SENSE OF EXCITEMENT
Macdonald didn’t know who directed it. He didn’t know who was in
it. He didn’t know what it was about. And that’s just the way he
“I have a rule: I don’t want to know anything about a film. I
prefer to watch it completely cold so I have no preconceived
notions,” he said.
Watching it at home on his DVD player, he felt a rising sense of
excitement. “This film made me stop and pay attention almost
from the get-go,” he said.
The tale of a rootless young man who winds up working at a
rundown motel deep in the woods for a mysterious small-time
gangster and his sexy young wife was unexpectedly polished and
compelling. And although the writer-director, David S. Marfield,
was unknown to Macdonald, he certainly recognized the actor
playing the gravel-voiced gangster: Peter Coyote. And some of
the supporting performers were fairly prominent as well: Lesley
Ann Warren and Michael Ironside, the latter perhaps best known
for his work in “Scanners.”
Even though the movie was obviously made on a small budget, it
clearly had something to attract some quality people. That
something was the script. It was quickly clear to Macdonald that
Marfield knew how to tell a gripping story.
“There are certain elements you always look for in a film,” he
said. “You recognize relatively quickly whether the filmmaker
had a feel for visual storytelling, and you recognize whether a
filmmaker has a way with dialogue.” Marfield, Macdonald
recognized, clearly had both.
“I like a film that shakes me up. I like a film that provokes me
to think intellectually or viscerally.”
“Deepwater” did that. Not many movies do. “You’re lucky if it
happens one of out every 10 times.”
SELF-INDULGENCE CAN BE FATAL
Too often, unheralded filmmakers remain unheralded for a reason:
They don’t know what they’re doing.
In an age when relatively inexpensive digital video cameras and
computer editing programs make it possible for vast numbers of
aspiring Spielbergs to make films, Macdonald says the films many
of them make aren’t worth the videotape they’re shot on. Far too
often, he says, self-indulgence is the fatal failing.
“Basically, they don’t have the talent to make a film. They’re
just in love with being a filmmaker.”
In 30-plus years of selecting films for SIFF and several other
U.S. festivals, Macdonald estimates he has seen upwards of
40,000 films. Many have been dogs. Especially in programming
season, when he’s often watching movies from 6 in the morning
until 10 or 11 at night, Macdonald admits “it’s hard to keep
“You get burned out, particularly when you’ve watched a number
of bad movies in a row. But all it takes is one film to turn
your head and deliver the goods. It recharges the batteries.”
“Deepwater” did that. Macdonald said he felt about Marfield’s
movie much the same way he felt about another low-budget indie
he screened more than a decade ago from another unknown
writer-director. That picture was “Slacker,” and Macdonald said
he knew at once that Richard Linklater was the real deal,
insisting that his film be placed on the festival schedule.
He said the film had been turned down by every other festival
Linklater had submitted it to and credits the enthusiastic
reception it received in Seattle to launching Linklater’s
This year, the festival has included “Deepwater” in its New
American Cinema competition, where it will compete with 11 other
films for a $5,000 cash prize. Marfield is scheduled to attend
the festival to introduce his film.
Charged up about his new find, Macdonald fired off a set of
enthusiastic notes to the Seattle office about “Deepwater.”
Seattle programmers grade candidates, and Macdonald gave
Marfield’s movie a B+, the only picture of the batch it came in
to receive that high a grade. So when the video arrived back in
Seattle, other programmers were eager to see it.
There are seven on staff, each with different tastes and areas
of expertise, all of whom view hundreds of submissions for each
festival. Barrett, for example, says she’s partial to
“dysfunctional Scandinavian dramas,” adding with a laugh that
that pretty much describes any Scandinavian film. She also likes
road movies and teen flicks. “Heathers,” she says, is a
“classic.” Programming director Spence calls himself “a
generalist. I like all types of films,” but when pressed said
that science fiction (“Alien” is a fave) and the movies of Lars
von Trier are favorites.
ELEMENT OF SURPRISE
Intrigued by Macdonald’s rave review, Spence pulled rank and
assigned “Deepwater” to himself and also to Barrett. (In most
cases three programmers are called on to pass judgment on a
particular picture.) They were both very impressed. “It took me
completely by surprise by the end,” she said.
Spence concurred. “It didn’t really tip you off in an obvious
way in the beginning about where you were going to end up in the
end.” A source of the surprise is that no one in the picture is
quite who he or she seems to be.
Echoing Macdonald, they said the element of surprise is
something they cherish because the process of winnowing through
hundreds and hundreds of films each year to arrive at the
precious few can leave a programmer jaded and exhausted.
“Sometimes you reach a point where you don’t want to see another
film, and then all of a sudden one gives you a sense of
euphoria,” Spence said.
Euphoria can be induced in several ways, Barrett said. “Some
films take you in and they don’t let you go. Others build
nicely. And then there are the movies that you can’t get out of
your mind. You may not have (thought) that ‘this is fabulous,’
but then the next day you find yourself really thinking about
them and thinking, ‘Huh! That was really effective.’ ”
“Deepwater,” she said, was one of those movies that stayed with
With all three programmers unanimous in their assessment that
“Deepwater” was a keeper, the film was put onto the schedule. It
will be screened twice at the Uptown Theatre in Queen Anne, at
9:15 p.m. June 9 and at 4:30 p.m. June 11.
Euphoria was what filmmaker Marfield felt when he received word
his movie had made the cut at SIFF. He’d submitted it to Cannes
and Sundance, had been turned down at both festivals, and was
feeling discouraged until Seattle came through for him.
“Deepwater” is the 33-year-old Minneapolis filmmaker’s
directorial debut, and its Seattle showing will be the first
time it will play on a big screen for a big audience. Better
yet, it’s screening during the final week of the festival, a
time when film industry heavyweights traditionally come up and
sample Seattle’s wares. He’s hoping the picture will generate
buzz and maybe even find a distributor.
“To get the film seen is a huge deal,” he said.
Not every film that makes it into the festival enjoys such
smooth sailing as “Deepwater.” “We’ve had knockdown, drag-out
fights,” Macdonald said, often over films with high levels of
violence or sex. There has even, at times, been screaming.
“People get very passionate, and the more contentious a film is,
the more passionate people get,” he said.
And usually that’s not a bad thing. “That passion is what fuels
the programming,” he said. “It reinforces you” and reminds the
programmer that he or she loves film and “you love what you’re
Seattle International Film Festival: May